Korea’s Future: The Role of President Lee Myung-Bak’s Administration

2008 012 04  korea-future icon

Lee Jae Oh is a distinguished politician in South Korea and has devoted his life’s work to the democratization of Korean society. After a short stint as a high school teacher, from 1971 to 1996, Lee was involved with organizations opposing South Korea ’s authoritarian regimes and working to bring about democracy. In 1979, Lee served as the director of Amnesty International-South Korea.

Lee launched his political career in 1996, when he was elected to the 15th National Assembly of the Republic of Korea. Two years later, in 1998, he was selected as the vice floor leader of the Grand National Party (GNP). He was re-elected to the ROK National Assembly twice, first in 2000 and then in 2004. In 2002, Lee managed the election campaign of Lee Myung-bak—who currently is the president of the Republic of Korea—when he ran for the office of Mayor of Seoul, and following its successful outcome served on the mayor’s transition team. In that same year, Lee was appointed to a GNP task force charged with planning for the 2002 presidential elections. Lee served as a supreme council member of the GNP from 2006-2007, and in this capacity played a pivotal role in the election of President Lee Myung-Bak in 2007.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Korea’s Future: The Role of President Lee Myung-Bak’s Administration

A Distinguished Visitor’s Luncheon

with

Lee Jae Oh
Former GNP Supreme Council Member
Senior Visiting Scholar at the U.S.-Korea Institute, Johns Hopkins University

The Future of Korean International Competitiveness

2008 06 12  future-korean icon

The globalization model adopted by major Korean companies like Hyundai, LG and Samsung has made Korea one of the world’s most advanced economies. To stay competitive, however, those companies will need to adjust that model in many ways says Joe Fuller, co-founder and CEO of Monitor Group, a leading international consulting firm.

Speaking at a Business Roundtable Luncheon series program, Fuller said that if Korea is to meet President Lee’s ambitious “747” economic targets, the country’s growth will have to be led by its largest companies, which make up a disproportionately large share of GDP. To power the Korean economy forward, these companies will have to change their internal governance, human asset management, innovation strategies and product development assumptions.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Beginning with internal governance, Fuller explained that Korean companies tend to be highly centralized, risk averse organizations. Those instincts need to change to allow Korean companies to promote a new culture of independence and risk taking among executives. Likewise, Korean companies presently have one of the world’s lowest ratios of non-nationals in senior management, thus missing out on new international expertise and fresh thinking. Korean multi-nationals are world-class and could do very well in competing for international talent, Fuller explained. They just haven’t made it a priority.

When it comes to product innovation, Korean companies focus their resources on developing new technologies, and new features for existing technologies. Unfortunately, this is one of the least profitable innovation strategies. Korean companies should diversify their innovation focus and attempt to develop new user experiences and new financing arrangements.

Finally, Korean firms need to change how they think about globalization. To date Korea, like Japan, has emphasized exporting uniform product lines. While this allows for the development of design and manufacturing excellence, it also makes Korean companies slow to react to changes in local markets. In the future, they need to emulate companies like Nestlé, where regional managers set the agenda for the company’s global operations.

Fuller acknowledged that these recommendations would be a tall order for Korea’s multinationals. “But I wouldn’t bet against them,” Fuller said, as he recalled how quickly they have grown so far.

The Future of Korean International Competitiveness

New Models of Governance and Corporate Strategy

with

Joe Fuller
Co-founder and CEO, Monitor Group

The Secret History of Capitalism

2008 01 30 secret-cap-icon

From 18th Century Britain to 20th Century South Korea

Over the last two and half decades, most developing countries have experienced slowing growth, rising inequality and greater economic instability. Ha-Joon Chang attributes these problems to a raft of policies—such as privatization, free trade and strong intellectual property protection—imposed on the developing world in bad faith by developed countries and the international organizations they control.

Chang believes the historical experience of developed countries, and those like South Korea that have gone from developing to developed status in recent decades, reveals the ineffectiveness of these macroeconomic policies. What the world economy really needs, he contends, is a new economic system that prioritizes long-term productivity.

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

The Secret History of Capitalism

From 18th Century Britain to 20th Century South Korea

with

Ha-Joon Chang
Professor of economics, University of Cambridge
Author, Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism

The We/Me Culture: Marketing in Korea

2007 06 07 we-me-culture icon

Koreans take great pride in their country’s ethnic homogeneity and are deeply influenced by Confucian values that stress group identity and social harmony. Seem like a sociology lesson? Actually, these facts should be just as important to branding and marketing executives as they are to social scientists says Dae Ryun Chung, professor of marketing at Yonsei University in Seoul. And they’re the reason why Korean consumers make purchases based on their attitudes towards individual and group identities, Chung continued. To succeed in the Korean market, marketers need to understand Koreans’ distinctive “We/Me” consumer paradigm.

 

Business Roundtable 

with

Dae Ryun Chang

Dean, Graduate School of International Studies
Yonsei University

Thursday, June 7, 2007 

 

Korean Consulate General in New York
335 E. 45th Street (between 1st & 2nd Avenues)
2nd Floor Conference Room

Which phrasing of McDonald’s classic slogan would Korean consumers respond to: “you deserve a break today” or “we deserve a break today”? Professor Dae Ryun Chang of Yonsei University says that Korean consumers weigh countervailing tendencies towards individualism and collectivism when they consider their purchases. He calls this phenomenon the “we/me” paradigm and thinks that anyone doing business in Korea should understand it.

 
At this talk, Chang will discuss the paradigm, its underlying causes and its strategic marketing implications.
 
 

In the United States, Chung said, mass-market consumer products tend to gain and decline in popularity along a broad, gentle curve. American consumers buy products they feel fit their individual identity. Thus, they’re more cautious about adopting a product or brand, but when they do, their loyalty is persistent.

 

In Korea, product lifecycles are much quicker. A new product or brand’s sales will explode but often decline just as precipitously. Individual Korean consumers pick their goods, at least partly, in order to conform to group patterns. When they buy Mercedes, they all buy Mercedes. When they switch to Lexus, they all switch. As a result, Korea has fewer niche markets than the United States, and it can be harder to forecast which products the group will adopt next.    

 

To Americans, conformity feels suffocating. American consumers seek out products and brands that will differentiate them. But to Korean consumers, Chung explained, following dominant trends can be a satisfying affirmation of collective identity. That’s why the majority of luxury cars sold in Korea are black, why so many Korean apartment blocks are made from the same blueprints and why fewer than a half-dozen movies make up more than 90-percent of the Korean box-office take.

At the same time, Chung warned against treating Korean consumers as automatons. Some purchase decisions are more influenced by group dynamics than others. For example, Koreans tend to buy housing, cars, entertainment and liquor in order to confirm their identity as Koreans. Alternately, Koreans tend to buy goods like beer, coffee and hair coloring in order to express their individual identities. If foreign marketers can create a message that balances Koreans’ impulses towards “we” and “me” they may just reap huge rewards. 

 

 

 

 

The We/Me Culture: Marketing in Korea

2007 06 07 we-me-culture icon

 

 

Koreans take great pride in their country’s ethnic homogeneity and are deeply influenced by Confucian values that stress group identity and social harmony. Seem like a sociology lesson? Actually, these facts should be just as important to branding and marketing executives as they are to social scientists says Dae Ryun Chung, professor of marketing at Yonsei University in Seoul. And they’re the reason why Korean consumers make purchases based on their attitudes towards individual and group identities, Chung continued. To succeed in the Korean market, marketers need to understand Koreans’ distinctive “We/Me” consumer paradigm.

Dae Ryun Chung
Professor of Marketing, Yonsei University

Thursday, June 7, 2007

In the United States, Chung said, mass-market consumer products tend to gain and decline in popularity along a broad, gentle curve. American consumers buy products they feel fit their individual identity. Thus, they’re more cautious about adopting a product or brand, but when they do, their loyalty is persistent.

 

 

In Korea, product lifecycles are much quicker. A new product or brand’s sales will explode but often decline just as precipitously. Individual Korean consumers pick their goods, at least partly, in order to conform to group patterns. When they buy Mercedes, they all buy Mercedes. When they switch to Lexus, they all switch. As a result, Korea has fewer niche markets than the United States, and it can be harder to forecast which products the group will adopt next.    

 

To Americans, conformity feels suffocating. American consumers seek out products and brands that will differentiate them. But to Korean consumers, Chung explained, following dominant trends can be a satisfying affirmation of collective identity. That’s why the majority of luxury cars sold in Korea are black, why so many Korean apartment blocks are made from the same blueprints and why fewer than a half-dozen movies make up more than 90-percent of the Korean box-office take.

At the same time, Chung warned against treating Korean consumers as automatons. Some purchase decisions are more influenced by group dynamics than others. For example, Koreans tend to buy housing, cars, entertainment and liquor in order to confirm their identity as Koreans. Alternately, Koreans tend to buy goods like beer, coffee and hair coloring in order to express their individual identities. If foreign marketers can create a message that balances Koreans’ impulses towards “we” and “me” they may just reap huge rewards.

About the Speaker

Dae Ryun Chang is a professor of marketing and dean of the Graduate School of International Studies at Yonsei University in Seoul, Korea. He received his Ph.D. in business from Harvard University, and his MBA from Columbia University. He has held visiting teaching positions at the Helsinki School of Economics and Business, Australian National University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Singapore Management University. Chang has published numerous journal articles in outlets such as the Journal of Marketing, Management Science and Decision Sciences. He currently sits on the board of directors at LG Fashion and Boryung Medience.

Business Roundtable

with

Dae Ryun Chang

Dean, Graduate School of International Studies
Yonsei University

Thursday, June 7, 2007
11:30 AM – 12:00 PM ♦ Registration and Reception
12:00 PM – 2:00 PM ♦ Luncheon and Presentation

Korean Consulate General in New York
335 E. 45th Street (between 1st & 2nd Avenues)
2nd Floor Conference Room

Which phrasing of McDonald’s classic slogan would Korean consumers respond to: “you deserve a break today” or “we deserve a break today”? Professor Dae Ryun Chang of Yonsei University says that Korean consumers weigh countervailing tendencies towards individualism and collectivism when they consider their purchases. He calls this phenomenon the “we/me” paradigm and thinks that anyone doing business in Korea should understand it.

 
At this talk, Chang will discuss the paradigm, its underlying causes and its strategic marketing implications.